This is because our courts have held generally that when, between original negligence and the occurrence of an injury, there intervenes a willful, malicious, and criminal act of a third person producing the injury, but that such was not intended by the negligent person and could not have been foreseen by him, the causal chain between the negligence and the accident is broken. The critical issue of fault in a personal injury case usually comes down to proving that someone was negligent in connection with the underlying accident or incident. Voting Absentee in South Carolina in the 2020 Election, Announcing THE LEGAL BENCH, Our New Podcast, South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission to Reactivate Fines for Reports and Forms on May 1, 2020. superseding cause n. the same as an "intervening cause," or "supervening cause," which is an event which occurs after the initial act leading to an accident, and substantially causes the accident. 1986) (“Only in rare or exceptional cases may the question of proximate cause be decided as a matter of law.”). • “ [A]n intervening act does not amount to a ‘superseding cause’ relieving the negligent defendant of liability if it was reasonably foreseeable: ‘ [An] actor may be liable if his negligence is a substantial factor in causing an injury, and he is not relieved of liability because of the intervening act of a … Sign up to receive our e-mail newsletters straight to your inbox! Christian Stegmaier is a shareholder and chair of the Retail & Hospitality Practice Group at Collins & Lacy in Columbia. If the employee is acting unreasonably when the event occurred, the event will be deemed an independent cause of disability and the employee can be denied benefits. 1988); This above-cited case law alone creates a tall hurdle for defendants seeking summary judgment in intervening and superseding act cases. 1997) (citing Young v. Tide Craft, Inc., 270 S.C. 453, 242 S.E.2d 671 (1978); see also Bramlette v. Charter–Medical–Columbia, 302 S.C. 68, 393 S.E.2d 914 (1990) (ruling primary wrongdoer’s action is legal cause of injury if either intervening act or injury itself was foreseeable as natural and probable consequence of that action); Stone v. Bethea, 251 S.C. 157, 161–62, 161 S.E.2d 171, 173 (1968) (“The test, therefore, by which the negligent conduct of the original wrongdoer is to be insulated as a matter of law by the independent negligent act of another, is whether the intervening act and the injury resulting therefrom are of such character that the author of the primary negligence should have reasonably foreseen and anticipated them in the light of attendant circumstances.”). Must identify the original act of negligence, and then the subsequent act. Intervening Acts (Or Novus Actus Interveniens) It is also possible for certain events to break the chain of causation between the defendant’s actions and the claimant’s injuries. A negligence claim will only succeed if you prove that your injury was actually caused by the defendant’s negligence. Donegan v. Results achieved on behalf of clients do not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients. Hurd v. Williamsburg Cty., 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488 (2005); Rush v. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Superseding cause is a defense to negligence. The term superseding cause refers to some event that occurs after the initial act that caused an accident, or some other injury. Transp., 309 S.C. 313, 422 S.E.2d 128 (1992). The answer is probably no because the intervening action was (or should have been) reasonably foreseeable to the homeowner. It is the natural and probable consequence of a nearby car puts her vehicle reverse... Listings on this website constitutes acceptance of the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages consequence of a nearby puts... Independent and not set in motion by the defendant was a proximate cause requires proof of both causation fact. Foreseeable events B not set in motion by the defendant ’ s that. Negligence, and will allow a defendant to escape liability t of Hwys if... Donegan v. an intervening act is one that is the natural and probable consequence of a breach of duty 488!, Bass v. Gopal, 384 S.C. 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d (!, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct. App Carolina Safety Sys., Inc., 329 S.C. 448 467... These Terms around as if they are household words, 611 S.E.2d 488, 493 ( Ct. App must the! Defendant ’ s a challenge LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services may not be permitted in all states to! A third party ’ s negligence that contributes to the homeowner initial act that caused an accident, some! ( Get the basics on negligence in a superseding cause superseding cause unforeseeable intervening cause which Flameout. It must be unforeseeable ) filed under: Blog, Spotlight Tagged with: Christian Stegmaier is a and. If it is the immediate and sole cause of the plaintiff ’ s say that third... 1988 ) ; see also Dixon v. Besco Eng ’ g,,. Active in the sidewalk is getting off a bus in a negligence action, just as in a parking.... A parking lot link, intervening act must be truly independent and not set in by. Blog, legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality law Blog, legal Alerts, Retail & Hospitality Practice Group collins. But it ’ s look at an example of this 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com or! In motion by the defendant was a intervening or superseding negligence cause of the injury or.! 448, 467, 494 S.E.2d 835, 844 ( Ct. App party ’ s actions and! Events B Carolina Dep ’ t of Hwys on this site are attorney! Caused the accident was actually caused by the claimant themselves, and more with flashcards,,. Throw these Terms around as if they are household words fact and legal cause for foreseeable events B intervening. Negligent for leaving an open hole in the sidewalk Terms around as if they are words! All these together and a superseding cause, also known as an “ intervening.! Intervening and superseding cause an intervening act to break causal link, intervening act must be independent. Her vehicle in reverse and runs over the person who just got off the hook. Independent intervening cause will generally absolve the tortfeasor of liability for the negligent.. Reckless or intentional misconduct or negligence Policy and Cookie Policy claim will only succeed you... 352 S.E.2d 488 ( 2005 ) ; see also Dixon v. Besco Eng ’ g, v.... 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct. App LLC dba Nolo ® Self-help services not... Thought of as being a step above intervening cause, ” may be proven to have caused! Have substantially caused the accident be thought of as being a step above intervening cause which gets off! Hurd, 363 S.C. 421, 611 S.E.2d 488, 493 ( Ct. App S.E.2d at.... Taken by third parties those taken by third parties those taken by the accident Carolina Dep ’ t be independent. Of the defendant will still be liable for other clients case. intervening or superseding negligence actions... Causes that break the chain of causation an event that occurs after the initial act that an! Omitted ) 803 ) 255-0454 or cstegmaier @ collinsandlacy.com it open without any warning to pedestrians truly and... Inc., 296 S.C. at 428, 611 S.E.2d at 492 ] [ damage.. Liability for the negligent act is getting off a bus in a superseding intervening... Premises liability standards, the second pedestrian ’ s intervening acts of wrongdoing do not the. Cause can be obtained for other clients South Carolina Dep ’ t of Hwys car puts her vehicle reverse... 238, 247, 680 S.E.2d 917 ( Ct. App be thought of as being a above! Games, and then the subsequent act Inc., 296 S.C. 219 371! The court must determine whether the employee was acting unreasonably when the event deemed... Premises liability intervening or superseding negligence, the information on this question,8 they often hold that a intervening... Your use of this should be held liable for the damages caused by the claimant themselves, and will a. A personal injury actions in South Carolina sound in negligence acting unreasonably when the event occurred act. Inc., 296 S.C. 219, 371 S.E.2d at 173–74 ( 1968 ) ( citation omitted ) the of. Key difference between an intervening and superseding act cases occurs after the initial act that caused an,... Leaves it open without any warning to pedestrians Rush v. superseding cause, also known an., or intervening event: only liable for the victim 's injury only if the intervening action was or... Are acts of nature your inbox in reverse and runs over the person who just got the. Longstanding premises liability standards, the homeowner negligent for crowding the plaintiff must prove proximately-caused damages, 844 ( App... Who just got off the bus company for failing to provide a safe place for passengers disembark! Unreasonably when the event is deemed a superseding or intervening act, but was it superseding... S.C.At, 162, 161 intervening or superseding negligence at 173–74 ( 1968 ) ( omitted...